Ukraine / Russia Conflict 2022

From Wiki by Civil Slave
Revision as of 00:33, 7 July 2022 by Sysop3z (talk | contribs) (→‎Bio Labs in Ukraine)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

News Updates

Bio Labs in Ukraine

“The zone is not a territory, it is such a test in which a person can either survive or break. Whether man will remain standing depends on his self esteem and his ability to distinguish the important from the transient.”

We are…

  • Anti-capitalist. Anti-war. Anti-liberal.
  • For building a better world for our present and future children.
  • Searching for and transmitting important information.

Confidential Pentagon papers have been leaked, revealing that the United states government has been operating top-secret biolabs in Ukraine and conducting biological experiments on Ukrainian soldiers while receiving complete legal indemnification for fatalities and injuries.

As the mainstream media and fact checkers continue to assert there are no Pentagon biolabs in Ukraine, fresh evidence emerges proving them wrong.

Internal papers illustrate what Anthony Fauci-sponsored “protection” and Pentagon “defense” means in practice, even as the US plans to boost its military presence in Eastern Europe to “protect its allies against Russia.”

The Pentagon has performed biological tests on 4,400 soldiers in Ukraine and 1,000 soldiers in Georgia, with possibly fatal results. All “volunteer deaths” should be reported within 24 hours (in Ukraine) and 48 hours (in the United States), according to the stolen papers (in Georgia).

Both nations are regarded as the region’s most devoted US allies, with a number of Pentagon initiatives being undertaken on their soil.

One of these programs is the $2.5 billion Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) Biological engagement program which includes research on bio agents, deadly viruses and antibiotic-resistant bacteria being studied on the local population.

Project GG-21: “All volunteer deaths will be promptly reported”

Per Dilyana Gaytandzhieva: The Pentagon has launched a 5-year long project with a possible extension of up to 3 years code-named GG-21: “Arthropod-borne and zoonotic infections among military personnel in Georgia”.

According to the project’s description, blood samples will be obtained from 1,000 military recruits at the time of their military registration physical exam at the Georgian military hospital located in Gori.

The samples will be tested for antibodies against fourteen pathogens:

  • Bacillus anthracis
  • Brucella
  • CCHF virus
  • Coxiella burnetii
  • Francisella tularensis
  • Hantavirus
  • Rickettsia species
  • TBE virus
  • Bartonella species
  • Borrelia species
  • Ehlrichia species
  • Leptospira species
  • Salmonella typhi
  • WNV

Read the full article here.

Bio Labs Update July 6th 2022

The Ukranian Biolabs story is starting to become unavoidable by Western media. Liberal media mogul Bloomberg had no choice but to report on it due to a US Ambassador directly addressing it. However, you will notice they don’t address the “Russian Lies” Burns is referring to in the title, they bury it in the article. Further down the page they address the allegations are pertaining to Russia’s allegations of BIOWEAPONS LABS IN UKRAINE.

The Chinese continue to adamantly agree with the findings from Russia. Yet Burns, and the Biden admin, continue to deny the existence of bioweapons labs in Ukraine. This is a semantics game they play now that it’s been confirmed by the DoD there are 46 US Biolabs in Ukraine, now the only question is as to whether those labs were creating “weapons” or not.

According to the US, adding gain of function to pathogens such as C19 is not a “weapon” even though it’s specifically engineered with increased lethality and transmissibility in humans. And if something like this were to “get out” of one of these labs, it can kill millions across the planet and shut down the world economy.

The entire argument the US are latching onto is based on the interpretation as to whether or not what they’re doing is considered “offensive” or “defensive”. But C19 has proven there is no denying whatever the US are doing in these labs is dangerous to the well-being of every single organism on this planet. Nations such as Russia and China are more within their right to question the US and their biological activity.

The US claiming these pathogens aren’t weapons, is the equivalent of saying that Nuclear warheads aren’t “weapons” until they are launched. Whatever the US labels them is irrelevant, because they can be used as weapons at any time. Anyone with bad intent could let these things out or administer them with precision.

The US/NATO are slowly losing control of the global messaging. Many countries, representing more than half of the world population, have requested a UN Security Council investigation into US biological activity in Ukraine and worldwide. The US continues to disregard the majority of the planet.

How much longer can the US deny these allegations? Russia and China are not backing down about this situation. How long do the allegations remain diplomatic? How long until China and Russia have had enough and have no choice but to use military force due to the US unwillingness to comply with allegations of violating biological weapons treaties?

The fate of the world lies in the balance, the US government are playing games with all of our lives, and the media are still largely absent on the matter. This Bloomberg article shows that the reality of global distrust in US biological activity, is SLOWLY creeping into written Western media. Still not a major headline or talked about on television at all, but it’s progress.

Historically, this will be known as the final nail in the coffin of the legacy media, as they willfully neglected the biggest and most impactful story on the planet.

-Clandestine

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-07-04/us-envoy-to-beijing-urges-china-to-stop-spreading-russian-lies

Russian Media & Censorship

History of Ukraine & Russia

George Soros & Ukraine

  1. To get the Truth - you must start at the beginning of what caused the current series of events to unfold…@georgesoros first started a foundation in Budapest which aimed to foster the democratic values of “open society” as defined by SirKarlPoppers...
  2. and supported dissidents living under Communist regimes. After the BerlinWall came down in 1989 - GS began to reposition himself, multiplying his "foundations" numbers in Central&Eastern Europe and former SovietUnion...
  3. “I wanted to get my views across, but it was really hard going, because there wasn’t a lot of interest in listening. Then came the sterling crisis, and that was the turning point, because I suddenly became a celebrity.” - GeorgeSoros ...
  4. with the ClintonAdministration, New Democrat, GS was able to make the kind of "inroads" he was unable to make before. GS had cultivated relationships with high-ranking officials in the US StateDepartment and at the Treasury....
  5. MortinAbromowitz, former US Ambassador to Turkey stated "He's the only man in the US who has his own foreign policy - and can implement it" talking about GS...
  6. When Abromowitz statement was told to StrobeTalbott, Deputy Secretary of State, Talbot, referring to SorosForeignPolicy respondend “I would say that is not identical to the foreign policy of the US government, but it’s compatible with it...
  7. ...It’s like working with a friendly, allied, independent entity, if not a government. We try to synchronize our approach to the former Communist countries with Germany, France, Great Britain - and with George Soros”...
  8. “He (GS) wrote a sharp letter to the President (@BillClinton) , raising parallels with 1938 and appeasement” [ironic that GS, who stole Jewish people’s property, and enjoyed it, is using 1938 and appeasement to try manipulating the US President at the time]...
  9. “But the problem with Soros is the extremity of his views - his tendency to beatify one side and demonize the other” [sound familiar? Take a look at all of GeorgeSoros “hobby countrys”]...
  10. *GeorgeSoros&Ukraine*

GeorgeSoros manipulation of Ukraine did not start in November 2013 or 2013 for that matter - it began in 1991.Ukraine declares its independence “Ukraine seems on the verge of producing the greatest payoff” for GeorgeSoros...

  1. he had been able to exert influence at the highest levels of government to see HIS ideas implemented.
  • Fall of 1991* Soros calls a “seminal meeting” w/ Dr.BohdanHawrylyshyn (an internationally known Ukrainian economist)...
  1. Dr. Hawrylyshyn had decided to return to Ukraine in 1988, to “help” steer its course. In 1990, Dr. Hawrylyshyn had become chairman for the new Soros foundation there. Deputy Minister of Finance, Olech Havrylyshyn (Doctors nephew) = on the payroll of SorosFoundation...
  2. Deputy Governor of the National Bank, Yurchyshyn, a Ukranian-American who had previously been VP at Bank of Boston) = on the payroll of SorosFoundation...
  3. *May 1993*

Leonid Kuchma - candidate to be Ukrainian 2nd President visited GeorgeSoros in 1993. After their meeting Soros called Hawrylyshyn, in Bucharest, and put Kuchma on the phone to relay the outcome of their meeting.

  1. Kuchma won in early July 1994...
  2. Evelyn Herfkens, of the World Bank, said “The Bank cannot support election campaigns of reformers; in the Ukraine, Soros did.”...
  3. *April 1994*

Bulletin of the Soros Foundation listed twelve grants, in the areas of civil society, economics, education, and mass media - 11 of them for amounts ranging from 5k to $31,800 (today: $9,728.3 to $61,872.02)...

  1. The 12th - to support independent television stations’ coverage of the Ukranian elections: was $363,100 (today: $706,469.47) - which would be used up within 3 months...
  2. Soros makes no bones about the interventionist nature of his role in Ukraine. At one point, he remarked, jocularly, “If this isn’t meddling in the affairs of a foreign nation, I don’t know what is!” ...
  3. He has installed his own paid representatives in the government of Ukraine-and,in the words of a longtime associate,believes that you“buy”governments to get things done-might also,conceivably,be viewed as the minor indiscretion of an idiosyncratic but beneficent individual…
  4. If history is any guide,however,these contributions will be strategic,w/ many strings attached;Stepan told me that when he was dean of the School of International&Public Affairs at Columbia University, he could not accept a million dollars that Soros had offered, ...
  5. because he could not meet the conditions that Soros was imposing.

This is a long thread, and continues

Other Russia News

Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination